Measures are aggregations applied to every segment in your data. They can you an overview of the segment, and help distinguish important segments from the less important ones. The measures live in the measure panel.

You can edit them in the `Measures`

tab of the data cube edit view:

Measures can be created by clicking the `Add`

button in the `Measure`

tab.

Simple measures consisting of a single aggregate function over a single column (with an optional filter) can be configured from the `Simple measure`

tab.

A measure can also represent some post aggregation or computation (see the specific measure types section below).
In that case you would use the `Custom`

tab where you can enter any supported Plywood
expression as the measure's formula.

The measure's formula assumes that `$main`

is the Plywood reference to the data that the measure will be aggregating over.

Imply can also provide some suggestions about simple measures that you might want to add. This is done by scanning the schema of the underlying data source and automatically suggesting a measure, with the appropriate aggregate, for any column that is not already represented by one of the existing measures.

This is particularly useful if you have added a new column to your data source after creating the data cube and now want to represent it in the views.

You can group related measures into measure groups. This can be particularly useful for measures which come from the same basic attribute or are otherwise similar.

For example in a sales dataset scenario you might be interested in `Total revenue`

, `Min revenue`

, `Max revenue`

, `Avg revenue`

, `Median revenue per user`

, and more.
It might therefore make sense to put those measures in a group.

To create a group simply click the `...`

icon in one of the measures and select `Add to new group`

.
Then drag the relevant measures into the newly created group.

You can configure how a measure is formatted from the `Advanced`

tab of the `Edit measure`

dialog.

The `Format`

field is used to specify the numeraljs formatting string that will be used to format this measure.

You can specify the format to be for regular numbers, currency, bytes, percentages, and scientific notation.
You can also adjust the number of decimal places that you will see in the numbers.
For example to see 3 decimal places (with abbreviation) you should set the format to: `0.000 a`

.
For more examples of possible formatting entries see the example formatting table.

You can transform a measure to be displayed as a 'Percent of parent split' or as 'Percent of total' instead of the default measure display.

You can specify how a measure should be filled on continuous visualizations (such as the line chart).

There are four possible fill options demonstrated above by four measures that are configured the same with the exception of different fill options.

The possible options are:

- Zero filled (default) - fill missing data with zeros, this is most suitable it the measure represents an additive quantity.
- No fill - leave missing data empty, this is suitable when missing values would likely indicate that the data was not collected.
- Previous value - fill missing data with last value seen, this is suitable for sensor type data.
- Interpolate values - interpolate the missing data between the seen value, this is suitable for sensor type data.

In this section we will look at some of the many specific measure types supported.

Filtered aggregations are very powerful. If, for example, your revenue in the US is a very important measure, you could express it as:

`$main.filter($country == 'United States').sum($revenue)`

It is also common to express a ratio of something filtered vs unfiltered.

`$main.filter($statusCode == 500).sum($requests) / $main.sum($requests)`

Ratios are often useful to see the relationships in your data.

Here's one that expresses the computation of CPM:

`$main.sum($revenue) / $main.sum($impressions) * 1000`

A quantile can be a very useful measure or your data. For large datasets it is often more informative to look at the 98th or 99th quantile of the data rather than the max as it would filter out freak values. Similarly a median (or 50% quantile) can present different information than an average measure.

To add a quantile measure to your data simply define a formula like so:

`$main.quantile($revenue, 0.98)`

It is possible to fine-tune approximateHistogram based quantiles, allowing you to determine your trade-off between performance and accuracy.

Enter a 3rd parameter in the quantile formula of the form `'resolution=400,numBuckets=10,lowerLimit=0,upperLimit=1000'`

to pass those tuning parameters to the underlying aggregator.

To understand how to tune the approximateHistogram parameters check out the Druid documentation

Sometime the rate of change (over time) of a measure is very important.

There is a magic constant available for expressions `$MillisecondsInInterval`

that corresponds to the number
of milliseconds in the time interval over which the aggregation (whatever it is) is running.

Therefore it is possible to define a measure like

`$main.sum($bytes) / $MillisecondsInInterval * 1000`

to give you the accurate rate of bytes per second regardless of your filter window or selected split (hour, minute, or whatever).

It is possible to define measures that perform a sub-split and a sub aggregation as part of their overall aggregation. This is needed to express certain calculations otherwise would not be possible.

The general form of a double aggregated measure's formula is:

`$main.split(SUB_SPLIT_EXPRESSION).apply('V', $main.INNER_AGGREGATE(...)).OUTER_AGGREGATE($V)`

Where:

`SUB_SPLIT_EXPRESSION`

is the expression on which the data for this measure would be first split`INNER_AGGREGATE`

is the aggregate that would be calculated for each bucket from the sub-split and will be assigned the name`V`

(which is arbitrary)`OUTER_AGGREGATE`

is the aggregate that will aggregate over the results of the inner aggregate, it should use the variable name declared above

Two examples of double aggregated measures are provided:

When dealing with netflow data at an ISP level one metric of interest is 5 minutely 95th percentile which is used for burstable billing.

To add that as a measure (assuming there is a column called `bytes`

that represent the bytes transferred during the interval) set the formula as follows:

`$main.split($__time.timeBucket(PT5M)).apply('B', ($main.sum($bytes) * 8) / 300).quantile($B, 0.95)`

Here the data is sub-split on 5 minute buckets (PT5M), then aggregated to calculate the bitrate (8 is the number of bit in a byte and 300 is the number of seconds in 5 minutes). Those inner 5 minute bitrates are then aggregated with the 95th percentile.

When looking at users engaging with your website, service, or app it is often needed to know the number of daily active users.

This can be calculated as:

`$main.split($__time.timeBucket(P1D)).apply('U', $main.countDistinct($user)).average($U)`

Here the data is sub-split by day (P1D) and then an average is computed on top of that.

If you switch how you ingest your underlying metric and can't (or do not want to) recalculate all of the previous data, you could use a derived measure to seamlessly merge these two metrics in the UI.

Let's say you had a metric called `revenue_in_dollars`

and for some reason you will now be ingesting it as `revenue_in_cents`

.

Furthermore right now your users are using the following measure:

`$main.sum($revenue_in_dollars)`

If your data had a 'clean break' where all events have either `revenue_in_dollars`

or `revenue_in_cents`

with no overlap, you could use:

`$main.sum($revenue_in_dollars) + $main.sum($revenue_in_cents) / 100`

If instead there was a period where you were ingesting both metrics then the above solution would double count that interval. You can 'splice' these two metrics together at a specific time point.

Logically you should be able leverage the Filtered aggregations to do:

`$main.filter(__time < '2016-04-04T00:00:00Z').sum($revenue_in_dollars) + $main.filter('2016-04-04T00:00:00Z' <= __time).sum($revenue_in_cents) / 100`

Within the measures you have access to the full power of the Plywood expressions. If you ever find yourself needing to go beyond the expressive potential of Plywood you could define your own custom aggregations. The aggregation could be any supported Druid aggregation.

For example Plywood currently does not support the modulo operator. While Druid has no native modulo support either, it is possible to modulo a measure by using a javascript aggregator.

To do so in the data cube options (`Advanced`

tab of the edit view) define:

```
{
"customAggregations": {
"addedMod1337": {
"aggregation": {
"type": "javascript",
"fieldNames": ["added"],
"fnAggregate": "function(current, added) { return (current + added) % 1337 }",
"fnCombine": "function(partialA, partialB) { return (partialA + partialB) % 1337 }",
"fnReset": "function() { return 0; }"
}
}
}
}
```

Then reference `addedMod1337`

in a measure's formula like so:

`$main.customAggregate('addedMod1337')`

This functionality can be used to access any custom aggregations that might be loaded via extensions.

Overview

- Navigation
- Data cubes
- Managing data cubes
- Dimensions
- Measures
- Dashboards
- Managing dashboards
- Visualizations
- Time compare
- Explain
- Data export